InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ytse

06/20/18 7:49 PM

#32148 RE: WhiteOwl #32140

The way I analyze this case, all big dogs do not like to pay the first place anyway, so they like to
apply this grind it, drag it and ride it till all the wheels fall off scheme. but
WDDD is a very interesting case, it does not have to pay attorneys up front
and it has a pot stock as a back up, so money is not a problem for WDDD,I think ACTI miscalculated the whole strategy.
icon url

LouisDesyjr

06/24/18 2:51 PM

#32178 RE: WhiteOwl #32140

Outlasting WDDD financially

Yes, Activision is trying to do that, but part of that is the fault of WDDD. When patent plays were riding high back in 2012, the company could have arranged several million that would have ensured having enough cash to the end of the case, or do some kind of merger with VRNG and connect with their case and expertise.

Instead, the company looks like it wanted everything for itself and may end up with nothing.

Why in the world would a company like Activision settle with a company like WDDD that is limping along and out of cash all the time?

WDDD allowed that to happen, and now that patent plays are out of favor, there are problems with raising cash unless all kinds of shares are issued.

People will note that as time went on the estimated damages also dropped, especially with the loss on the issue of the corrected filing date for the patent.

Louis J. Desy Jr.