InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

twaflyer1

06/20/18 2:50 PM

#36480 RE: Testpilot #36477

yes, but not in Wartime, which lasted 3 years longer! Testing does not mean production models!
icon url

twaflyer1

06/20/18 3:41 PM

#36481 RE: Testpilot #36477

Test pilot! If there aren't problems now, and throughout the pre-production period, then this Penny should be trading in the dollars already? The real problem being ignored is the replacement factor, as just about everything, from the Battery, to the housings, to the re-arrangement of some components in the battery, (and outside of the Battery too,) might have to be altered or converted in some way! Everything will be different, (at least as I see it,) when a radically new product is installed! Even the sensors might have to be changed as the electron discharges might be different in some way! Then we have to consider the instrument panel as well!

No, I see problems, but I also see solutions, but those are dependent on the money available, and I don't see any manufacturing company that will be willing to provide all the money to virtually re-do quite a few things? Remember, if the new CHS product doesn't live-up to quite a large increase in electron storage capability, (Maybe 3X+ more than present capabilities,) then money will NOT BE provided for all the required changes, that is if there are more than just a few minor ones! There will definitely have to be certain revisions though, as this product will not only be reduced in size, but will require other safety measures as well!

I have faith that answers will be found, but they had better be found sooner or later, as we are talking big money to re-engineer some parts and delay the Introductions of the new EV's as well, which can be costly too? Co's want things done today or nearby tomorrows, not distant rollouts, though just one new model might be reserved for the new CHS substance, but keeping the mainstream vehicles rolling out as usual!

Things can be done, but big money coming in after just one year more, say the end of 2019? Doubtful, but there are going to be quite a few Companies working on this stuff, with something being done now as we speak, so like everything else, each step of maybe a 20 step research and development ladder will have to be painfully reached before we can be considered a success! I hope I am wrong about everything, but tell me when things go right in a Penny Stock Company, then I will assuredly make less damaging predictions? But CRTG is a Technology Company, and we must work within a consortium of maybe 20-30 other Companies who have products designed to be included in every new EV that is launched, and a fair portion of the Engine related Co's might have a hand in changes that may be necessary! Will those Co's do what they have to do, or will other Co's have to found to replace those who cannot fit the bill?

It is not just make a product, place it in a vehicle, then run off to the races? I sure hope it is somewhere near to being that simple, and maybe it will be easier than I expect it to be, but I cannot count on it!

We on the board generally like this CHS product, but we just cannot believe that it will behave as expected or make the impact we believe will take place! But since a similar Hexasaline product is already in place in some products, moving on to CHS might not be such a monumental step up as far as integration goes?

I believe someone will use it in the next year or so, so the true capabilities of the CHS material will soon surface! I look forward to that possibility! Hey, who knows, maybe a vehicle is already running with CHS in it? It would be great if the CRTG staff would let us know about such moves? If such a test vehicle is already being tested, then cross your fingers, its success might lead to a number of Companies getting on board! But I think they would mention such testing, don't you? Holding long!! GL to all.