InvestorsHub Logo

was CUIN2

06/18/18 9:17 PM

#75722 RE: colmar #75721

I haven’t seen the actual contract/loan language, but my “layman’s” understanding of cashless warrants meets the standard used by the professionals drawing up and entering these agreements.

If the maximum number of 500,000 warrants was used anywhere in the contract, and professionals understand the concept of “cashless warrants” meaning less than 500,000 in totality because you are using part of the 500,000 to buy the remaining warrants without putting up cash, I think the equation would become meaningless. JMO.

TenKay

06/18/18 9:36 PM

#75726 RE: colmar #75721

Many have commented earlier on the penny stock lawyer he choose....

That response by EMA demonstrates just how incompetent he is...did he even review the SPA used in the transaction to see the basis for service described?

Also, the FedEx tracking info is interesting....although not included in that text.

It shows the package was delivered to a residence. So while Rory was suggesting the “office” was empty because of the conferences...in fact it was his residence and he wasn’t home for 2 weeks.

Convenient that it was “lost” after confirmed delivery to his residence.

...and he still has not filed an 8K about it.