Unclevername - did you read pp8 & 12?
You wrote:
"...I missed your discussion on why this data was skewed and your link to a more reliable and comprehensive resource of comparable executive compensation."
-------------------------------------------
i don't need a "link to a more reliable and comprehensive resource" b/c the one posted by one of the most loyal members says it ALL & completely underscores my belief that Steven Sprague has been grossly over-compensated lo these many years.
from your "evidence" which purports that SKS's compensation is in line:
-------------------------------------------
p. 12
"REVENUES - Companies reported median [annual] revenues of $212 million, with a range of $1.7 million to $2.5 billion" [emphasis added].
-------------------------------------------
Wave's entire history of revs (something around $225K) is literally 1/1000th of the sample's median, which you stated was supportive of the SKS is fairly paid theory!!!
but ya know what?!?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Jimmy crack corn & i don't care!!!
have a good day,
SPIN
PS nice one on yahoo awk!