Replies to post #5560 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[jcryan19]

So far you put out very few questions about DNAP, but you do have messages about it's being doomed to failure.

If you posted massages about DNAP legal problems, money problems, personel problems or even a leaky roof I could understand. But what do we get from you??? That it is a penney stock and is doomed to failure.

Many penney stocks don't survive, but some because they are bought out, or merged with a larger company. I believe this will happen with DNAP, but thats just my thoughts.

(The last part is on topic so I'm not making this a off topic message)


JMHO, Jim

[ustacud]

Now, folks, I don't have a cock in this fight, but, lets hear somebody argue with THIS post from froggy!

Dick

[Manti]

frog: Excellent post. Very well stated. Now if you'll just focus on dnap rather than the overzealous longs, this will be a much pleasanter place to hang out. I for one have never found your posts offensive, even when you've corrected me in trying to clarify something that I've posted (such as msft being a penny stock, which of course I never said, but some longs took it to be that). I've been in the world of message boards and penny stocks too long to be bothered, and I also realize the limitations of the written word, especially with the way communication skills have deteriorated in our society. Tell me, what is your position vis a vis dnap at this time, if I may ask? tia