InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Kmacneill116

06/15/18 4:56 PM

#23320 RE: IoT- #23319

NO prob we got this. I really dont have any doubt this will fly very soon within this month. 001s for sure! $$$$
icon url

janice shell

06/15/18 4:57 PM

#23321 RE: IoT- #23319

Actually, practically no lawyers are willing to work on contingency, except for specialists in personal injury and class actions.

This shorting nonsense is just being recycled; it's an excuse that's been used by MAXD before. And the reason is pretty clear: it runs the risk of being thrown into receivership.
icon url

4on4off

06/15/18 5:14 PM

#23324 RE: IoT- #23319

Yup. Happens all the time. Looking good here. $MAXD
icon url

Urbanlegend

06/15/18 5:39 PM

#23332 RE: IoT- #23319

Easy case? Very funny. They’ve been litigating for years losing at almost every turn and recently wasn't there a tweet copied here with an email said to be from the CFO in which it was claimed that MaxD has spent $14 million ‘together with its partners’ on these easy cases?

As far as I know ‘Paul’ isn’t on contingency or on any case at all currently before the courts.
icon url

grantastic

06/15/18 5:48 PM

#23334 RE: IoT- #23319

MAXD had very DIFFICULT case, according to CFO.

So difficult, in fact, they "never anticipated how much time money and resources" it would require!

That's probably why MAXD is not the plaintiff on ANY lawsuits currently, with or without a contingency lawyer.

https://twitter.com/OCMillionaire/status/996984436427186176


When the case is easy, Attorneys will often work for a percentage of the winnings;)

Looks like MAXD might have a good case.

MAXD