InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flipper44

06/02/18 4:46 PM

#175662 RE: Diamondjim61 #175652

I think you might be slightly mistaken. Receipt does not guarantee publishing date.
icon url

HappyLibrarian

06/02/18 8:49 PM

#175693 RE: Diamondjim61 #175652

We all eventually reach the same point when it comes to Mr. Goldman and Ms. Powers because the pattern of evidence becomes overwhelming.

One does not have to be loyal to NWBO management to be a long.

Period.

icon url

rogers5729

06/02/18 11:08 PM

#175704 RE: Diamondjim61 #175652

I don't view this as inherently a sign of deception. I think it's entirely likely, though admittedly not certain, that there had been a submission to another journal out since last fall. Since building toward ASCO has always been part of the plan (see the size of the booth), they had to have *something* published before the conference. With the prospect of the first journal dimming, they went for another (lower tier) journal that could guarantee a quick turnaround to publication. That would ensure that something could get out in time. If that's the case, it would speak to the sensitivity of management to the timing. That would bode well for the coming weeks.

This is all a hypothesis, of course, but it's a distinct possibility. I was at the meeting too, and there's no reason why Linda and Les would have stated a categorical "yes" for having submitted the publication to a journal. If truly subversive, they would have tried some weasel language instead. IMHO.
icon url

DoGood_DoWell

06/02/18 11:37 PM

#175705 RE: Diamondjim61 #175652

What you are implying is not true. Not true at all. Every sentence and detail is mischaracterized. LL is portrayed as a saint. As in the Catholic Church, all is not as it appears.
icon url

DoGood_DoWell

06/02/18 11:40 PM

#175706 RE: Diamondjim61 #175652

Do not judge a book by its cover. You have to read the whole thing to understand the complexities of the plot, and the NWBO book has not been written yet, and there isn't even a cover.