InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flipper44

05/29/18 3:57 PM

#174467 RE: AVII77 #174303

AVII, since you and I agree it appears the last thirty patients were placed on treatment, have you ever, in all your years, seen this done if a trial is judged futile?

Does anybody have a clue why it is highly likely the last 30 patients in the DCVax-L trial were not given a Placebo? Instead it seems quite apparent they were placed on treatment?

Anybody???
icon url

MI Dendream

05/30/18 7:55 AM

#174659 RE: AVII77 #174303

AVII,

This has been my investment theory since Aug 2015 which has led me and friends
/family willing to listen to my 30 minute stump to sextuple our holdings. See post 142426 re: what I believe transpired back then. All of the bread crumbs have substantiated this theory since, but yesterday’s enrollment data confirmed this in my mind.

If you have an alternate theory as to why only previously consented patients could finish out enrollment and then they were only offered treatment per regulator mandate, then I am all ears. I don’t believe another story that fits everything we know exists.

PFS is in the bank, and the enrichment of the treatment arm with 15% more patients adds to the size and power of the treatment arm, thus increasing likelihood of OS separation statistically, making for a very fat tail.