Lol. Blnk most likely was very profitable for Taug.
"...was very profitable for Taug."?
"WAS" is past tense, suggesting BLNK is over for TAUG!
TAUG is (or "WAS") showing a Balance Sheet positive on its BLNK investment! If CONSULTANT CEO Seth Shaw sold any portion of the holding, i.e. common or warrants, and didn't tell the investors, this would further cement the notion that Shaw is only transparent, when he is moved to be transparent! TIMELY COMMUNICATION TO THE INVESTORS HAS BEEN AN "OCCASIONAL" PROBLEM FOR CONSULTANT CEO SETH SHAW!
Every single time Shaw invested any portion of the Cowan proceeds the action was widely "advertised" via the public wires! Shouldn't the TAUG investors expect the same treatment for Shaw's sells? If there have been no "sells", it is a rather simple calculation to determine any PAPER PROFITS derived from BLNK! But "paper profits" are just that "paper"! The total gain was provided in a post just a few days ago; however, if the PAID CONSULTANT wishes to provide an update, GO FOR IT!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
