Longfellow, good post. So why doesn't LP just say so. It is not betraying any confidences, but saying why they continue with the trial. That would allay much of the speculation and pushing for unblinding this trial prematurely. Complete silence is not the answer. Unfulfilled deliveries, e.g., 90 day investigation, publication, etc. do not engender support. They got their vote, their bonus shares, so where is the payback in a little communication? Les told a number of investors, first the vote and then shortly thereafter the pub. Its been a month and just crickets.