Here is another indication that the recently issued shares have to be for ECAB.
Dec 2015 Other payables - Due to third parties = 312,782
Which means there is no debt older than 3 1/2 years So why would they issue 20,000,000 shares (presplit) if there is no debt older than 3 1/2 years? It can only be for ECAB.
Would you be surprised? It's not like they are very accurate with their statements and promises... Of course some of it is indeed what they believe and intend, but it is rather obvious now that they do indeed deliberate mislead (or lie if you prefer to be blunt).
Solomon will continue to lie as long as he believes it is necessary.
One thing I wonder is; are the TRW-partners pissed of at Solomon for the 36.6%-ownership, i.e are they refusing to help SIAF in any way no matter what, or does Solomon simply not care about the SIAF shareholders so that it is better to have us bleed to death than to affect TRW in a minor bad way?