She could not be culpable for share price dilution since October 2015, if the trial has been successful since then. Rubbish, imo. That sounds more like an argument the bears will make. I have concerns about whether they could have protected the price or not as of late, but early on, there is no way they could have provided meaningful OS stats for regulators in 2015, and if they had PFS success back then, they could not have shared it, imo, because it would have destroyed the integrity of the trial stats for OS in the future. Besides, I don't think they were ready for manufacturing back then.