It doesn't work that way. If a CEO were to fabricate numbers, audited or not, he would be risking jail time. The audits stopped when the company and the auditor came to a realistic disagreement on both sides - an impasse. The auditor needed to follow GAACP, by further investigating a customer. The cost would have been substantial. Marco realistically didn't want to spend the money or take the hit on the annual report by having a going concern issue when it didn't need to be there.
They had a choice of waiting it out for 2 years (plus the interim time period) or have a new auditor research the customer at a substantial cost. Turns out they waited the 2 years (ending April 28, 2018) even though the new auditor recently signed off on the customer... fulfilling the GAACP requirement of 17 cfr 229.304.
I have a feeling that the audited K is done. Waiting. If I were Marco, I would wait until the 30th (a Monday) to file the audited K's just to make sure everything is done according to Hoyle.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
