Just because DBMM is a public company does not mean every single transaction, investment, etc is public information. Hence the protective order request by DBMM and granted by the Judge. Would we like to know who and the details, sure, but not expecting to, as with any other public company.
DC acquisition has been the model since acquisition and showing increasing revs q/q as seen in 2015 Q3 filing.
20 years? LMAO. wrong. 2004 wasn't 20 years ago. Took about 6 years to find the right acquisition with DC.
Asher owns nothing. Asher signed a bilateral consent decree and CAN NOT own shares nor seek shares in a public company as has been discussed many times already. Section 5 violations and more pile up against asher. DBMM seeking damages next?
Recession hit and affected many avenues of capital for companies across all markets, not just OTC. Reviewing filings shows this.
Financing isn't allegedly, it has been provided to the court.
go dbmm go