InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jmjjw

04/07/18 10:45 PM

#96181 RE: downdraft #96179

MMEX proponents are grasping at straws, in irrelevant side-steps and tap-dances these days.

As has been pointed out repeatedly, the South Orient/Texas-Pacifico improvements are independent of MMEX, and unrelated.

In this case, the linked article cites work north-northeast of MMEX's site.

None of this cited activity has any relationship, or bearing on the one, and only critical element for MMEX's success, at least in current context - project financing.

while is it happy-happy, feel good, optimism, it is totally and completely irreverent to MMEX, or the barriers ahead.

None of the cited elements of this "analysis" increase MMEX's "odds of success."
icon url

Woody73z

04/07/18 11:02 PM

#96184 RE: downdraft #96179

So I live in odessa born and raised Im in my 30’s ive seen booms and busts. That’s all the Permian basin is... boom and bust. I work for a major oil production company my lease is about 20 miles north of the mmex site. Right now we are booming. The representatives in Texas would like to see this happen. I agree some things about the way things are going with mmex make me think twice. In the end it’s cheap and I know first hand of what’s going on in fort Stockton and the word around town is they want to hire people. Everyone is waiting. We will see where this goes. At this price I’m in all day long. Go MMEX.