InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

i7squared

03/30/18 3:19 PM

#146207 RE: Eicheljager #146172

I'm willing to forgive all the reports in the past from Paul and Steipp about the 100's of RFQs and how out of those LQMT would hit on a few (that was a from Steipp/Hauck Q report and also on this board). Okay I can forgive those few that never materialized base the circumstances you pointed out. But now with his latest blog it's time, there are no more excuses available - and it doesn't have to be the 91st day either. As I said before there should be a verifiable contract on the next Q report, that gives Hauck at least 2 months beyond his last blog report that something would happen (maybe it's not a promise) but it is a statement that something would happen in the near future, no one can argue that it was not that at a minimum. That is all I'm saying there are no excuses left going forward at this point at least not for me - I've been an investor for 12 years now, read every Q/10K, every blog, every industry article, researched every board member, and every employee; there are no more excuses left for me - I'm waiting until 3rd Q report this year if there isn't enough revenue to pay at least the employee salaries I'm out! Maybe they should have produced the LQMT chess set - may have sold more of those than the "martin knife"?
icon url

Eagle1947

03/30/18 5:43 PM

#146217 RE: Eicheljager #146172

If no results were expected as the result of the Blog post why being it up at all ... maybe he was just asked to say something and just came up with the next thing that came to mind.

If anyone would like to understand the situation and have a good read to boot go to the library and borrow Grant by Ron Crernow.