InvestorsHub Logo

jerrylev

03/21/18 2:33 PM

#514289 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #514282

I cannot speak for HM but I just speak for myself. We may not agree on what will come back but there was never a heated argument about it. What we strongly argue about are all the incorrect and illegal things that some people keep spewing out. They keep ignoring what were written in POR 7 and treating it like it's nothing and it means something else, like ignoring the Constitution and saying things that (should) happen because you happen to like it.

hotmeat

03/22/18 11:32 AM

#514420 RE: Johnnyiwantsome #514282

Absolutely not personal but rather about the "never wrong" stance taken on subjects which actual documents prove to be false.

We've been "instructed" for over a year about Prospectus's and how they verify the Preferred Offering backing only Prefs theory.

Well guess what,..i did read several and they all DEBUNK those claims as nonsensical with clear concise language stating otherwise.

That theory is at the core of the Commons/Estate Ownership tripe, so as the Pref theory fails, so does the Commons.

I strongly suggest that everyone should read a Trust Security Prospectus if they need to verify what i posted is indeed factual.