InvestorsHub Logo

GoodGuyBill

03/19/18 11:46 AM

#162857 RE: pgsd #162855

No, PGSD, I did not. You joined the board in June of 2016 so you may not be aware of my posts regarding my support for NWBO.

Perhaps the issue has to do with terminology as you imply. To fleece investors is to intentionally obtain a great deal of money from someone, typically by overcharging or swindling them. Linda is not doing this. But I do believe Linda is manipulating shareholders to get the necessary funds to keep the lights on to get DCVAX to the finish line.

Look at all the times have NWBO released a vaguely worded PR that caused the PPS to go up. Everyone starts thinking, news is right around the corner. then, bang! dilution pps falls.

IF THAT ARTICLE IS NOT PRODUCED BY JUNE 1ST, NWBO IS FINISHED!


You said you did not say Linda was going to "fleece investors" but you stated a "ploy be LP &Co to raise funds" a ploy being 'a cunning plan or action designed to turn a situation to one's own advantage' by definition would not be good. That is what I responded to.

exwannabe

03/19/18 12:10 PM

#162865 RE: pgsd #162855

... but you stated a "ploy be LP &Co to raise funds" a ploy being 'a cunning plan or action designed to turn a situation to one's own advantage' by definition would not be good.


I would think "ploy" quite well applies to issues A/B w/o shares to convert to, then giving terms to warrants to free up the shares. Thus getting the needed votes.

But what is ironic is you just asserted that because it benefits LP it by definition would not be good.

I thought you were on the long side :-)