InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

daveymoore

03/11/18 4:18 PM

#12150 RE: rsh #12149

you missed my point; the fact they have a goal does not mean they do not know the cost of their hydrogen production; I am sure the public will learn much more from HYSR during and after the March 31 test. Do you think they would be doing this for world view (just as they did previously with their first prototype) in Korea if they did not already know the result LOL? Why suddenly did they triple their goal for how long it could run ininterrupted for instance? Of course they have already tested it in private.
icon url

Frizzo

03/11/18 4:39 PM

#12153 RE: rsh #12149

The cost goal of $4.90 was not used to sell notes. It's old news. Has been the goal for a while now. I also disagree they DO know their costs. Why/How, could you state a specific cost to make something tomorrow if you don't have a cost today? Just because they haven't disclosed it to you doesn't mean they don't know. The market reacted to Tim stating he feels they will have a product sometime this year that's within range of this and can produce H2 for at least a minimum of 1,000 hours or the 365 goal. At that point maybe someone will partner... Dude, what else is science, more than just a belief in a theory/idea till proven factual??? You DON'T want HYSR to succeed. Your claim that it will take acres of solar panels to produce a few bubbles of H2 is ridiculous. Their Gen1 system produces a large amount of hydrogen for a device that uses completely green energy to do it! If that device winds up being able to produce H2 for even $10 a kg for over 1000 hours I guarantee someone will buy them up or they will stick with their projected route of partnership because their phone will be ringing off the hook!