InvestorsHub Logo

nidan7500

02/26/18 7:50 AM

#142416 RE: nidan7500 #142415

will it ASO be effective???Let's see. But, as far as we know it is at least not toxic. Lets ASO =ALSO

Investor2014

02/26/18 8:07 AM

#142419 RE: nidan7500 #142415

But, as far as we know it is at least not toxic.


Some maintain that A2-73 becomes toxic at the dose levels required for therapeutic blood concentrations. Is Anavex hiding such a problem and grappling with how to overcome it or should we believe the bulk of independent research that highlight the safety of A2-73 along with the company's published AE profile?

polarbear77

02/26/18 8:36 AM

#142424 RE: nidan7500 #142415

Agreed Nidan. The FDA has apparently placed a fork in the road leading to CNS drug approval.

Big Pharma (except perhaps Biogen) have seemingly taken the same disappointing turn towards withdrawal, whereas Anavex recently announced plans to take the fork towards (pioneering) precision medicine CNS trials by utilizing in depth pk/pd data and Illumina’s genomic sequencing analysis and biomarker analysis (paralleling successes in the oncology space).

Quite a dichotomy.

Add to that, in Fall 2017 the Company and Ariana outlined why they BELIEVE that the cognitive IMPROVEMENTS & STABILIZATIONS are dose dependent (or blood concentration dependent) rather than the alternative (random responses possibly unrelated to 2-73 efficacy), see pk/pd & ctad presentations.

As you said, none of this guarantees success for Anavex, however I’d conjecture that it certainly helps to POSSIBLY explain the Company’s/CEO’s confidence (in recent conference calls and appearance at the Noble panel), and/or the Forms 4 ceo stock purchases, and/or the BOD large additional stock option awards in December 2017. Just my opinion of course.

GLTAL