Replies to post #44952 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[3531niapoc]

jfburk, I don't know where it says in my post where longs are dumb. All I did is reply to Danielle's post because I did not agree with her opinion.

[dfmantx]

jfburk - what are you trying to get at. First of all I am a long time long. Second of all, I do not appreciate longs trying to blow smoke up everyones azzz, by saying the poor pps has no effect on the viability of a company.

For this company or any company pps is vital to the companies existance. Last time I looked we were still operating in the red, and the last I don't know how many times we have used our stock to generate needed cash to keep us afloat.

Sure we have assets we could see or borrow against, and we may be able to get other types of loans or financing. But if management cannot salvage this pps, our major source for funding will be gone, and we will be on "borrowed time"

[trunkmonk]

jfb, if I went by hindsight only, I would say the bashers have a very good case. why, the current price has now depreciated to exact levels before the split. post 1:15 split has now been totally wiped out.
on the bright side, mostly for new investors, upside chances are better than ever.

[duke00324]

...jf, much advice has been given in the past, imo...

...why is criticism always considered bashing by you and your ilk?...

...when you tout the company's allegedly solid "financial statement", noone accuses you of PUMPING...

...when I came to the Yahoo board on Dec. 30, I was amazed at the "buying" in the upper $3's / lower $4's after an approximately 100% move...I, along with many others suggested that folks be taking some profits at that juncture...you won't see many 100% moves go substantially uncorrected...Duke...