InvestorsHub Logo

slambino

02/20/18 3:55 PM

#105106 RE: DewmBoom #105102

That WOULD be a huge disappointment. However, it is clearly not the case. Why would they voluntarily subject themselves to an audit if their revenues weren't exactly as reported? LOL

Take a hike

Russ777

02/20/18 3:56 PM

#105110 RE: DewmBoom #105102

You do realize what you said is libelous and can be held for defamation. You do realize this, correct? You should choose your words carefully.

Subjugator

02/20/18 5:17 PM

#105144 RE: DewmBoom #105102

excellent point there, except $8-9m Q2 would probably make more sense since they are faking it, not silly $3m.. also that whole self-audit idea is kinda not that great considering they are faking financials, otherwise brilliant logic man! You show them!

jrf30

02/20/18 5:37 PM

#105152 RE: DewmBoom #105102

Crossing from a bearish opinion

to libel and defamation. You really aren't very smart, are you??

"What a huge disappointment to investors when they know that the unaudited financials were fake. "

That is SOOO far over the line! They KNOW? The financials are FAKE? You realize you should be SUED over this, right???