InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The Real Deal

10/08/06 10:42 AM

#94882 RE: lesnshawn #94878

Thank you for proving my point. To my memory Rufus (who does seem to be somewhat honest at the very least) did not directly deny that he received a C&D.

If the Humanitarian Group sent a C&D at all, whether it is legally binding or not, we need to know and need to know why they did it.

Game, set, and match.
icon url

The Real Deal

10/09/06 10:21 AM

#95419 RE: lesnshawn #94878

Game, Set and Match. I will tell you why knowing if a C&D was sent is important. In the scams that I have followed the first signs of it being a scam was when the finger pointing started. Each executive, or person involved in signing off on anything began pointing the finger at the other person. "It's his fault this didn't work out." They start backing away from deals and trying to cover evidence. A C&D is the first thing a scammer will do to try to distance himself and make it look like he was the victim.

In cases like this, each side was just as guilty but they both have a predetermined plan to point the finger at each other if anything goes wrong. This causes confusion and doubt in the mind of anyone wanting to persue legal action.

(Note: Sorry for the repost, I meant to post this to Ins)