InvestorsHub Logo

rawman

02/17/18 10:38 AM

#44642 RE: loanranger #44636

Now that we know that the investment was made in the SECURITIES of the company in question, that investment only ADDS to the problem and makes it MORE DIFFICULT to acquire the needed hard assets needed with even less cash.

That's IF I understand the situation correctly. Frankly this is the first company that I've run across that portends to be an operating company but acts instead like a mutual fund.


No corrections required! The post is dead nuts on!

BTW...to my knowledge the investors and potential investors have never yet been "officially" apprised of the details related to the announced "electric vehicle infrastructure" initiative.

PER THE MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES OF NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION AUTHORED BY TAUG'S PAID CONSULTANT, JOHNNY CESARIO, aka JOHNNY C, IT APPEARS THAT TAUG INVESTED IN BLNK OR BLNKW! PER CONSULTANT CEO SETH SHAW, AN 8-K, WITH THE INVESTMENT DETAILS, WAS TO BE FILED "WITHIN THE NEXT FOUR DAYS BUSINESS DAYS". I DID NOT CHECK LATE YESTERDAY OR THIS MORNING TO SEE IF THE 8-K HAS APPEARED! IF THE DEAL WERE AN EQUITY INVESTMENT, SPECIFICALLY IN BLNK AND/OR BLNKW, WHY NOT INCLUDE THIS INFO IN THE ORIGINAL PR? OOPS! IT MUST BE "DOUBLE SECRET STUFF"!