InvestorsHub Logo

nhtrader

02/16/18 9:21 AM

#509307 RE: AZCowboy #509305

AZ, I think you meant class 22 not 19 at the end of your post

BBANBOB

02/16/18 9:32 AM

#509310 RE: AZCowboy #509305

Az I am curious about something and would appreciate your input please.

IF trusts are preferd specific

All trusts behind both P's and K's is for the SOLE benefit of the preferd it funds, don't then ALL value in those trusts need to be divided EQUALLY for the benefit of those ISSUE ONLY?

As you suggest all of the others are as you suggest for commons only, so aren't then the ones backing each of the preffereds ONLY for their benefit?

So wouldn't the TOTAL value of the trust go specifically to those?

David West

02/16/18 9:57 AM

#509320 RE: AZCowboy #509305

AZCowboy - when you state “a common share evaluation”, are you referring to the beneficial interest, or escrow markers?


Tranche 6 Class 22', The Original Common Share owners of The Washington Mutual Inc., (The Parent Corp.), ... I align with D. Beck, (WaMu Capital Corp.) and his testimony, with a common share evaluation of between $12.00 and $15.00 Dollars (WMI' said NO' to JPMC's offer of $8.00)

Drugfalco

02/16/18 11:42 AM

#509347 RE: AZCowboy #509305

Thanks AZ