Bkshadow, if WAMU holders are not involved in the distributions from the DB / JPM / FDIC settlement, then, pray tell, why were myself and another WAMU shareholder (an IHUB member, btw), who were present in the Santa Ana courtroom for that fateful hearing, invited by the judge to speak before the group?
And, in a room full of 30 or so attorneys on all sides of the issue, why did none of them step up to question why WE were speaking on behalf of interested parties? We had very clearly identified ourselves as former Washington Mutual shareholders.
And why did the judge spend several minutes listening to us and, then, make an in-court ruling that interested parties had clearly been notified of the hearing, since we were in attendance?