InvestorsHub Logo

masterarms

02/14/18 8:42 PM

#102338 RE: iltghwism #102337

Yup, sounds about right to me. Look at the long term success, even if we're up 100% yoy how can you argue with that?

cwhockey31

02/14/18 8:42 PM

#102339 RE: iltghwism #102337

Q3 could also include the $3.8M from the first GRO3 order.

Felo31

02/14/18 8:42 PM

#102341 RE: iltghwism #102337

I wouldn’t call a 100% growth flat..

jrf30

02/14/18 8:44 PM

#102345 RE: iltghwism #102337

One mistake in that.

"Q2 was basically flat from previous year due to"

NO, no. It was not FLAT. Previous year was $1.5 million. this year was $3.3 million. That is up over 100%! Actually, up 120%. That is not flat by ANY means. It shows growth, and since some orders were not accounted for, yes Q3 should be larger. But definitely NOT a disappointment as a flat quarter versus last year. Not many companies can say they grew over 120% YOY. Especially with the same two cafes open, and #3 only open for a few weeks. It shows we have other things brewing, and our growth is more than just S&L. :-)