InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sillyinvestor

02/14/18 1:24 PM

#508795 RE: UncleBo #508792

Hey Bo! You think they shut it down on purpose?

Was anything said just prior to cause you to believe that, or just theorizing? I just chalked it up to provider issues. I checked whois, and all pertinent registration, certs, etc. are up to date. I will state it seems a strange coincidence. ¯\_(?)_/¯

icon url

boarddork

02/14/18 1:31 PM

#508798 RE: UncleBo #508792

Nail on head! Classic. thanks Bo!
icon url

AZCowboy

02/14/18 1:34 PM

#508800 RE: UncleBo #508792

~ Hey Bo, Thanks For Weighing In’ ~

Yes, and that ? Is 100% Correct ...

Here is an interesting little multiple billion dollar ... nugget’, ...

The most recent, FDIC balance sheet, ... shows the priority # 1 (Administrative Expense) being addressed with JPMC’, ... BUT it also continues to show the ... senior & subordinated claims, ... When, JPMC itself submits the actual values of the WMB Notes as a double plus value, as of January 2015’, ... ? ...

And, ... the WMB Notes Supporting Trusts, ... show on DB’s Exhibit 2’, ... BUT ? they were not listed or considered in Dunn & Phelps Attachment 1’, when the 11.9% loss ratios were calculated ... hmmmm ? ... right ?

That Original WMB Noteholder Program, with their values so enhanced (as per JPMC’s reveal as of Jan 2015) ... would have surely thrown off those loss ratios just a bit ...

just sayin’

AZ
icon url

jerrylev

02/14/18 1:40 PM

#508802 RE: UncleBo #508792

It makes sense because I don't see why a NYSE company is merging with an OTCBB company and then uses its stock symbol, just for the NOL. With NSM size, it will take forever to consume the NOL. So they must look at servicing the WAMU mortgage.

On a different subject, I have some PIERS shares and it is not all paid off. I don't follow the WMIH / LT news very much these days but will they continue to pay PIERS or all what we get now is interest money?
icon url

Royal Dude

02/14/18 1:52 PM

#508807 RE: UncleBo #508792

Thanks Bo and AZ a "Red Badge of Courage"
icon url

Johnnyiwantsome

02/14/18 2:22 PM

#508815 RE: UncleBo #508792

So is a plausible Merger ?

The Wand 1 2 and Inc subs are interesting. They are both telling and It is Ironic.... the name ....funny.


So as It may be contended; WMIH/NSM will be a servicer, originator, and possibly ~ later~ a full blown Bank...

Will this bank will be capitalized and fueled by a pool of cash producing rmbs, trusts and other assets flowing thru "the Merger Change of ownership event" that were of the original 30 billion WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC.

However, on and in, the the Merger "event and change of ownership" is it then that Escrow released marker holders will be compensated?

Will compensation stock in the new WMIH/NSM or will it be a straight cash payment? Of course this should be on the on the 75/25 basis on a basis of their (WMI markers) released ....???

~This could then be plausible.


? Regards
B