I don't think we should penalize Lombardo for past mistakes he was not responsible for.
We all have the same leeway to change our minds. The vote can be changed to 11:59 PM March 20. My reasoning has little to do with an Interim CEO, other than to note the BOD, or Lombardo himself didn't want to be permanent. After all, he, Sara and Petit all got bribed to stay on until at least March 1, 2018. So, the real issue for me is that handing over the ability to kick the can down the road outweighs the probability of a deal sufficient to fund this company. Its too small a company, with NOT the resources to get it done without massive capital requirements to do it. Leverage to do a deal? They can't do a deal without more than 15 million shares required + 50 Mil ATM? You've been screaming for monetization forever. Yet, in your view as I understand it, you're banking on the Interim CEO making a deal that requires 30 million additional shares. And if he doesn't make a deal, we'll(you and I) get diluted at whatever price the sp is. Currently, thats about a years worth of funding for 30 million shares. Just to be clear, the consequences of throwing good money after bad usually ends badly. In my ADXS career, the reality of historical precedent that sh's get slaughtered outweighs an Interim CEO ability to get it done, when the ship he inherited is so bloated. Its just risk on top of risk in my view. But like all sh's I'm hoping for a good outcome. Thats Monetization without dilution.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
