InvestorsHub Logo

Orphanboy

02/11/18 7:49 AM

#8828 RE: Amac1001 #8826

Some Twitter Social Media posts about #MVES.

From that it looks like they had a private placement back in May 2017 with a high of 0.012. https://twitter.com/moviestudiocio?lang=en

Back then, May 2017, they are talking about finding locations for the production of "Pegasus", whose tagline is "believe". Looks like the subject is a young girl and her horse. That film is now, apparently, in production.

I watched the trailer for "Bad Actress". B movie, and that is being kind. But the social media talks about the studio itself, found on FB, and has hundreds of "5 star" reviews from people who did work for #MVES.

Someone on this board in the past week, I do not remember who, said about the AMZN deal that "relationships are key". So, for some reason AMZN entered in to a relationship with #MVES.

The search for content is never ending. "movies" are value created out of thin air. Someone's idea or story they want to tell.

But, it looks like the IPO came out at 0.007 in May 2017. Hell, if todays #MVES prices are all you have to show for putting money in back then, I suppose I would have been long gone.

All in all, IMO, do your own DD.

#MVES

WinnSton

02/11/18 8:23 AM

#8829 RE: Amac1001 #8826

The stock is still way under valued. The movies don't have to be very good to make money. If they were A movies we'd be looking at a huge pps. The big studios are 10-30 bucks a share, it's all relative. This is a smaller studio producing real movies and the price is still less than a freaking penny a share. This should be and will be trading .20+ this year. Obviously let's get to .01 first but it's no problem. This thing will fly up and I surely wouldn't want to miss the ride.

nosfelle

02/11/18 7:03 PM

#8860 RE: Amac1001 #8826

whomever has more content...wins

doesn't need to be good

i see all kinds of content from leading providers that sucks

just doesn't matter, imo

$MVES