So let me see if I understand what you are saying...
If Steve does not disclose the risks involved with a stock (SHR#) past or present, and others buy into that stock not knowing the risks; then Steve would be a scammer and an unfit CEO of any company?
Just making sure that is the point being made here at EEGI/IMHI?
So if Steve did disclose the information about the risks and potential issues that could arise; then would it not be the shareholder responsibility to read the public documents before investing? If they did not read or do DD; then the responsibility of actions would fall on the investor, and not the CEO (Steve Smith) or the company (Shr#) in that case.
Personal decisions... Personal responsibility... Personal consequences...
As stated on Twitter in a reply to someone... October 13, 2015 8-k SHR#... Good read for.public information and disclosure of risk and cautions...