InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sandlisted

02/06/18 6:45 PM

#36795 RE: I-Glow #36794

Interesting! There is no way a company signs over 49% of their company without doing the proper DD, and checks, with lawyers, etc. FACT.
icon url

Sandlisted

02/06/18 6:46 PM

#36796 RE: I-Glow #36794

Sorry but this is a losing battle, no matter which way it's 'twisted' it doesn't make any logical sense. LOL
icon url

Sandlisted

02/06/18 6:53 PM

#36798 RE: I-Glow #36794

Also, if it was misrepresented, and not a real company, then why is the Plaintiff's Mersky and Zouvas instead of GRAS, their lawyers would be all over Mersky creating a fake company to fraudulently acquire 49% of the shares... LOL

More things to contemplate people...