That's a good question. But who would be questioning?
The SEC doesn't care because nanosux is dark since, what? 2012-2014? The OTCM doesn't care because nanosux didn't pay their fees, contrary to the outerwebs, what you send to otcm is meaningless, because OTCM will only stop sign-bone you if you don't pay the fees. That's in the small print, not the OTCM nonsense on the front page that they care what you file.
Nevada doesn't care because nanosux didn't pay their business license fee with the SOS there, nor with the California SOS I believe. Ca is forfeited for non payment.
So who's going to question a non regulated companys pretend SHM?