![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/49001.png?cb=1672684156)
Friday, January 26, 2018 12:41:59 PM
The SEC doesn't care because nanosux is dark since, what? 2012-2014? The OTCM doesn't care because nanosux didn't pay their fees, contrary to the outerwebs, what you send to otcm is meaningless, because OTCM will only stop sign-bone you if you don't pay the fees. That's in the small print, not the OTCM nonsense on the front page that they care what you file.
Nevada doesn't care because nanosux didn't pay their business license fee with the SOS there, nor with the California SOS I believe. Ca is forfeited for non payment.
So who's going to question a non regulated companys pretend SHM?
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q2 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over $130,000 in Net Income from Q2 2023 to Q2 2024 • ACGX • Aug 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies Unveils AI-Powered Healthcare Infrastructure to Deliver Intelligent Healthcare Solutions • AVAI • Aug 14, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q2 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 13, 2024 7:11 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Nears Completion of Reverse Merger with New Candidate • KGKG • Aug 12, 2024 10:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment and DigiTrax Entertainment Sign Agreement to Broadcast "Karaoke Cloud" on iDreamCTV • AHRO • Aug 12, 2024 8:45 AM
HealthLynked Partners with RxSpark to Enhance Medication Access and Management for Patients • HLYK • Aug 12, 2024 8:00 AM