Replies to post #15828 on Oncolix Inc. (fka ONCX)

[Rat Fink]

JUST BS!!! NO LINKED SOURCE DOCUMENT TO_VALIDATE_"CLAIMED"_POST_QUOTE!!!

THAT IS JUST TEXT WITH NO SOURCE DOCUMENT LINKED TO VALIDATE THE "CLAIMS"!!!

ROTFLMAO!!!

LONG "ONCX"!!!

;-) ;-)

[Rat Fink]

BS!!! SEC & INVESTORS HERE DO NOT WANT OR_NEED_ANSWERS_FROM_CEO!!!

INVESTORS HERE KNOW ONCOLIX CEO IS AN OUTSTANDING AND HONEST CEO AND HAVE NO SUSPICIONS WHATSOEVER ABOUT HIM!!!

ALSO, I SEE NO LINK TO THE SO-CALLED "SEC QUOTE" IN THE POST. HMMMMM...

INVESTORS HERE LIKE ONCOLIX AND ONCOLIX CEO!!! THAT IS WHY INVESTORS HERE ARE ONCOLIX INVESTORS!!!

"ENOUGH SAID"!!!

;-) ;-)

[BLight1911]

Where is the link to this? This is a blatant lie.

[BLight1911]

SEC wants Redman to help make the rocket fuel to put man on Mars...maybe?

IMO

[reaper247]

SEC correspondence requesting clarifications/corrections from public companies is common.

Public companies get these requests and amend filings on a regular basis.

So now, I suppose we are supposed to believe that any company that has filed a amended filing is scam?

LOL…

People can view these requests on the SEC Edgar website. They are so common and irrelevant, that most brokers and data providers don’t include them in the filing history.

Anyone who visits the SEC Edgar website can view in chronological order the filing in question, the request for clarification and the company’s response by supplying an amended filing.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001584137&owner=exclude&count=40&hidefilings=0

As of the time of this post, all requests for clarification have been addressed and there are currently no unresolved issues between the SEC and Oncolix.

Claims to the contrary are either intentionally false or ignorant of the truth.

Always happy to help.

GLTA, IMO and FWIW.