But there potentially lies the problem. It is only once per year this valuable opportunityy arises and unfortunately it appears again it is a missed opportunity. With that sort of attendance and so few questions answered I would imagine management were very happy. We on this board (and others) know this does not represent the true reflection of shareholder's frustrations. They have demonstrated over a considerable period of time that they have a policy of only saying the very minimum and keeping the rest to themselves and select investors who sign NDA's. This is exactly why when such opportunities exist they need to be taken otherwise it is back to guesses and speculation. For us to be this far into the trial and not have a clue even what criteria the management expect to utilise in order to end the trial, let alone what year this might happen for sure is beyond belief. This is taking every consideration for SOME silence perhaps critical.
My thoughts on the number of questions per attendee make sense considering the number in attendance. Because 10 were answered and not every person made an effort to ask a question probably reflects that many of the questions asked covered the collectives main issues. If however people on this board feel that more questions need to be answered then someone would need to review the answered questions vs the ones submitted by the board prior to the ASM. If there are gaps then those unanswered questions should be submitted to LP and LG from a respected member of this board such as Flipper/Senti and shared with fellow longs once replies are received. I am sure LP/LG would be more than happy to answer legitimate questions that would not give further ammunition to the Fudsters if interpretation would be conceived as an issue. I expect Lawyer talk for some replies where appropriate.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
