InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Researchfyi

01/21/18 3:46 PM

#141131 RE: LTriple #141123

LTriple, look at the historical quotes. From .06 to .43. There were times when LQMT traded much higher. Your premise of old vs New is an example of extremes and not the norm. Long term shareholders often A. Hold and add more at higher prices. B. Take profits at higher prices and buy back on dips. C. Sell. Or D. Just hold. The strategy is the same with any equity. And your point was?
icon url

Researchfyi

01/21/18 3:57 PM

#141132 RE: LTriple #141123

LTriple, if you have been reading my posts you will also note that I have suggested that a new class of shareholders would be better for all shareholders. That will not happen under a $300 million market cap.
New shareholders cannot and are not able to ever throw a new lifeline to LQMT unless they are prepared to do what Mr. Li has done. So it is not the average trader of 1 share or 2 million shares that are able to throw us a new lifeline. Not even a 20 million share spike will do it. Only LQMT, a partner or buyout will do it.