I disagree with your conclusion Bill as that is not my position.
I love the company, I love the stock, I believe it will go much higher because it has the numbers and performance and outlook to make it happen. I bought another 5000 shares last week and may do the same over the next week or so. I never sell any shares.
When I throw out a post such as my last one, I do so because I think there might be an incrementally better way for the company to do something. Over the long term it makes little difference. In other words, if the company were to do exactly as I suggested, perhaps the stock gets to $10 3 to 6 months earlier than it otherwise would have. And maybe it does so in a smoother, less gut wrenching, way.
Another way to look at it.....I used to be an engineer and project manager leading teams in developing new products. Most project managers would eventually lead a team to a successful outcome. I always measured my own personal success by whether my team did it faster or maybe more efficiently or perhaps ended up with a more robust product than if some other product manager were leading it. But in reality, the difference between doing a spectacular job or an average job might only be 3 months or a few hundred thou or something else. Not a big deal. That is why it is really the rare employee that is not a commodity. It is also why a left handed pitcher that can throw 100mph makes $25mil per year.
And that is how I view the constructive criticism and suggestions being discussed.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
