Well, I believe that failures are not entirely due to the stupidity or incompetence of people who have otherwise succeeded. Therefore, it is not a given that Li will "succeed where others have failed". Nonetheless, it is not an undebatable axiom so it very well maybe true if I am making any sense (that would be a change for sure).
Playing "what if", ... I don't know why many feel that CE and Apple is Li's main focus given that there seems to be multiple other applications for the material. I try not to HOPE for anything, but if there is a smooth path to something I'd guess it is Non-CE related.
Ergo, why is there so much obsession with the LQMT - Apple connection on this message board ?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
