InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

laranger

08/28/03 2:12 PM

#42306 RE: Corp_Buyer #42302

Seems to me that Ericy is saying

"We signed a license agreement with IDCC, which (obviously) contains a royalty rate. Other than the rate, it's none of Nokia's business"

End of lawsuit. End of story. End of Nokia's motion.


icon url

quartzman0

08/28/03 4:48 PM

#42359 RE: Corp_Buyer #42302

Corp and Ams:

Eric does not infringe on IDCC patents. They are a paying licensee and paid all back royalties (although at a much discounted rate). So their statement to such an effect is correct, eventhough it took 10 years and a court suit to get them to this position.

Q