InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PatentGuy1

12/26/17 5:33 PM

#139275 RE: Eicheljager #139270

Its a document that has floated around since Josh posted in April. Why no one wants to talk about a 100+ page document with so many potential clues is beyond me.



The reason that I haven't commented on the document is that I haven't read the entire document for two reasons: (1) it is almost 100 pages long and would probably be close to incomprehensible (at least to me) in English; (2) every translation that I've seen makes it incomprehensible (at least to me).

The translations that I've seen have been so bad that I personally cannot put any weight behind the document. Everything is so open to interpretation, which I feel leaves me unqualified, as a person illiterate in Chinese, to opine on the document. Consequently, I have left it to others who either can either read Chinese or comprehend the translations to opine on the document.