InvestorsHub Logo

plutoniumimplosion

12/14/17 5:24 PM

#43062 RE: Johnny_C #43060

That is what Cowan could have had to pay if full punitive damages were applied after a trial.

You were against the settlement. What happened to all of the posts where you claimed $3.9 million and by golly $20 million, you betcha?

rawman

12/14/17 7:42 PM

#43070 RE: Johnny_C #43060

I am sure they had very good reasons for doing it


Yes indeed, TAUG did have a very good reason to settle! IMO...it was to avoid having Seth Shaw publicly "exposed" during Cowan's cross-examination!

Of course this "visibility" commenced, when the Cowan valuation experts exposed Shaw for his thrashing of the shareholders via the idiotic Pilus Energy acquisition! It only took TAUG two months, after Seth Shaw blew $2 million on Pilus, to decide the wastewater treatment process was going nowhere!