InvestorsHub Logo

PutzMueler

12/13/17 11:53 PM

#31423 RE: Revello #31422

Seems to me this technology is not a technology yet.
They are learning.

https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/rare-earth-elements/overview/program-overview

I get what its all about, but it seems to me that the only way they will make money(assuming technology),is by being onsite when the coal is being mined. Anything that is already above ground (overburden) would all have to be drilled to be able to find any concentrations, but I would find that quite unlikely, not to mention very costly.

Landmark8211111

12/14/17 12:13 AM

#31424 RE: Revello #31422

I really don't understand your point?...99.99% of the folks on this board are invested in NioCorp. Why would we be interested in 'At Jedda Coal' . do they have a message board?, who cares! Sheesh

prototype_101

12/14/17 7:44 AM

#31427 RE: Revello #31422

Revello said, 102 ppm for scandium, Coal Age magazine reported in its January/February issue."

102 ppm for scandium is not "very low".


questions >

Does anyone know the comparable ppm number for NIOBF production estimates?

Does all coal deposits contain this resource, or is this one isolated coal deposit being reported? If just one, how big is the deposit cited?