Furthermore, Mr Bill Schaefer stated to the court in this linked in post: #msg-136786114 that 2016 quarterly and annual financial statements were already completed and ready to file. And that this was being done "in preparation for the Merger / Acquisition of an income producing asset for the company".
Mr Schaefer further stated to the court that "Merger Negotiations" had been ongoing since on or about May,15 2017. And that Guard Dog (GRDO) was active and not abandoned.
Mr Schaefer stated all this to the court "Before" the motion was dismissed. He didn't state it in a tweet, or a PR, or a filing, or a podcast. The president and CEO of a publically held company stated it to a court. Now, Mr Schaefer is legally bound to proceed, with the oversight of the court, because of his previous statements. The oversight would be the court reversing it's previous decision to dismiss if Mr Schaefer doesn't make good on his statements to the court.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
