Exactly, we're really not asking that much. I am not even saying that they have to unblind the data before I hand in my proxy vote. All I am freaking asking for is maximum date certain for that unblinding and perhaps some information on the many other topics that they can legally discuss. The maximum date would probably even suffice as long as there was no wiggle room in the way they worded it and it was not say 5 years from now.
The idea that ordinary shareholders are bad people or stupid for finally standing up for themselves and saying,
"If you cannot even be just a little honest and transparent with us, when you are asking us to take an action in your favor and the favor of your inside clique, then maybe the DCVax L IP that Linda Liau (not Linda Powers but Linda Liau) developed should be in the hands of a management team that will actually do something with it, instead of stringing along hapless investors year after year with "stay tuned" (remember 'stay tuned' is not my quote but Linda Powers')."
They have already let DCVax Prostate languish despite being approved for a Phase 3 trial. How many years has that been pending partnership again? And this despite the fact that prostate surgery has debilitating effects on men and furthermore is one of the biggest cancer indications.
Right now, absent some clarity provided by NWBO management, a lot of us believe we're going to lose either way, so we might as well at least try to fight.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
