InvestorsHub Logo

checkmate28

12/04/17 8:18 PM

#425 RE: Traderfan #424

One would think if Cougar was having a problem with the DNI ground team, they would have made that information official to their share holders and reported that as a reason for being late in a response to the extension PR at least as a courtesy to their SH.

Why would Cougar not send their own mgt when so much was at stake?

Why would they stick with only the one RC drill that was tearing up the large flakes?

Its my understanding that a number of the Cougar drilled RC holes were twined with the DNI Core drill. That'd be interesting to see the difference.

Apparantly DNI had a technical recommendation to go with the core drill. Why didn't Cougar step up and pay for the Core drill.

Is it possible Cougar was prioritizing resources to a more important Lithium project their working on and were just to thin?

rrten

12/05/17 12:13 AM

#426 RE: Traderfan #424

Traderfan, I have just posted about Cougar on Stock house about the fact that all companies under a certain size on the Australian Stock Exchange have to file an activities report and cash flow report every quarter, no exception. I wish they had this rule for small resource stocks in Canada. IMHO, I do not think that Cougar is telling all, which they are suppose to do.

ValueFact

12/05/17 12:15 AM

#427 RE: Traderfan #424

Curiously, this was a critical project for Courgar. Why wasn't top management on site! The lack of involvement and the inability to even provide the proper drill equipment when the prospective return appears so enticing -- IMO, it hints of Courgar's illiquidity.