InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DeerBalls

11/26/17 11:12 AM

#43786 RE: RagingBullll #43785

Ok, that would be "nice", but with what has gone on, I would not expect it. VPLM has very limited resources, in both cash and manpower.

Rich Inza, the IR(Investor Relations) person, wears many hats. I know he is attending the oral arguments before the Supreme Court, this week. The company is working on our behalf and has for the years I've been here. They are on our side!

I am not arguing against your idea, but it has been bought up many times over the years to no avail.

Good luck to us, although I think our good fortune has shown itself and its potential!
icon url

VVVVVV

11/26/17 3:29 PM

#43797 RE: RagingBullll #43785

Would be a great time for a conference call. It’s been eighteen mionths since the last one. We’re due.
icon url

nyt

11/26/17 6:03 PM

#43802 RE: RagingBullll #43785

Not sure but I think there is some "Alice standard" Supreme Court issue that has to be dealt with. Alice has something to do w/the patentability of an abstract idea or process. I'm not sure how it gets dealt with & my sense is it will be no problem for vplm. I'm sure someone will chime in about this aspect. After that, seems to me to start scheduling court hearing dates for the infringement cases. And there's the vplm vs Locksmith case as well. In the afterlife, you'll likely have to check in w/your great grandchildren for updates.