ACTUALLY, I haven't left yet, but am soon, and I will respond this time. I am not convinced by the 8k that it was a wash, and not convinced by some that say they were at the SHM and are telling people it was a wash.
(Not my definition): If it is a "voluntary dismissal with prejudice", it is the result of an out of court agreement or settlement between parties that they agree is final. If the case is dismissed "without prejudice" the lawsuit can be filed again by the plaintiff.
1. Cases can be dismissed with prejudice that involve a settlement. 2. We know SFOR DID NOT have to spend money on Entrust. 3. However, We DO NOT know that Entrust has not accepted an agreement or agreements that SFOR has demanded.
I am not saying there is more than a wash, but I will believe the details in future financials that disclose more information (I'm not fully believing people on a board).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
