Its still not a true OOBA patent. From what I read and interpreted was that Entrust authenticates within multiple layers of servers. SFOR does something similar, but close enough that its not worth litigating any more.
The problem here is peole read an 8-k and know the whole story.
It's similar to watching a movie trailer and acting like you know all the details of the movie.
Everyone should read the patents and get the entire story.
And Within SFOR's patents they name other "OOBA" patents to describe the flaws and even how they really aren't OOB. Hense why in the court filings R&G will use that term "True OOBA".
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
