Replies to post #917 on Cool Technologies Inc (WARM)

[ChrisMissing]

If Hassett was so smart he would have brought in a top tier business man and they would not have made the horrible mistakes they made that slowed them down by at least 3 years. He probably still needs to do that regardless. Maybe his larger problem is he doesn’t know how to hire. That other zero that he hired ted b. ,hurt the company tremendously.

[kayak_wench]

I almost agree with you on this statement "With this opportunity " buy stock below $0.10 a share if you have an average above $0.30 ", but would add the clarification of "consider buying this stock under these circumstances if you have money for which you will be fine with should it evaporate. BTW, I do not fall into this category.

Noticed this "So if Spirit Bear for example from the worst nightmare to a resourceful supporter because they even see the driving force this company has maintained through all the start up nightmares. " and wonder if this means SB is still involved. If so doesn't that mean CoolTech did a bad job on completing the last S-1 that didn't mention them. If not it means SB is a < 5% holder which means they liquidated a good bit of stock which doesn't seem good either. So SB still being involved is a cause for concern one way or another.

As for "Look sometimes you gamble on a long shot but how often do you actually have a lock that is right in front of you" there is never a "lock". This is not a "lock", nothing is lock. It is still a gamble, but less of one.

I think your confused about how many people are planing to jump ship at a given price (reference to "Funny how many people just want to break even and will sell below $0.50 while this trades up.") A few posters have said they have to consider selling on a price increase but they all clarified that it would depend on the nature of the increase. Meaning if it increases based on non-tangible news then one has to consider selling when making a profit given the history of how many strong runs this has had yet zero revenue. If substantial revenue is announced I am sure investors will integrate the nature of the news into their calculus of determining when to sell.

"Now they know the difference between advantage takers and real opportunitnistic relationships "
I have actually been concerned about whether this is true. I'll have to wait for future tweets/blogs to see if it is worth posting about.

Totally agree about not investing because of what anyone says...."Do not invest because of my ramblings"

Things to consider that may have been overlooked in the Jatropha news:
- this customer is a large government agency likely with lots of money to spend facilitating the development of Jatropha in Mexico. Other related needs could be smaller, more reliable, pumps and generators.
- The PR notes that the testing is complete for up to class 7 trucks, but the customer is only buying kits for class 3 and 4. Someone else is likely seriously interested in class 5 to 7 applications.

[Abashwal]

You mention Tesla, Apple and Google, I am missing something here, would you be so kind to explain, unless it is related to Electric cars and the possible use of our Technology in multiple components of Electric cars.